Part A
ADS5463IPFP
Texas Instruments
- Lifecycle
- Active
- Stock
- 6870 PCS
- Package
- HTQFP-80
- Series
- Data Acquisition - Analog to Digital Converters (ADC)
Replacement verdict
Not a drop-in replacement
The ADS5463IPFP and ADS5413IPHP are not drop-in replacements for one another. They differ in resolution, sampling rate, analog input architecture, and digital output interface, so a direct board-level substitution is not feasible without redesign of the signal chain, clocking, and output capture circuitry.
Different resolution
Different sampling rate
Different input architecture
Different output interface
Parts at a glance
Part B
ADS5413IPHP
Texas Instruments
- Lifecycle
- Active
- Stock
- 725 PCS
- Package
- TQFP-48
- Series
- Data Acquisition - Analog to Digital Converters (ADC)
Key differences
Rows are prioritized by design impact. Highlighted values require attention during substitution.
Key electrical and mechanical differences between the two devices
| Parameter | ADS5463IPFP | ADS5413IPHP | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 12 bit | 12 bit | Both converters provide 12-bit resolution, so quantization noise floor and nominal dynamic range are comparable. |
| Sampling Rate | 500 MSPS | 65 MSPS | The maximum sample rate determines the input bandwidth that can be digitized; the ADS5463 supports much higher-speed signals than the ADS5413. |
| Input Type | Differential | Differential | Differential inputs improve common-mode rejection and even-order distortion performance in both devices. |
| Supply Voltage | 3.3 V analog and digital | 3.3 V analog and digital | Matching supply rails simplifies board-level power design and allows similar decoupling and regulation schemes. |
| Output Interface | Parallel LVDS | Parallel CMOS | The output signaling differs; LVDS offers better noise immunity at high speed while CMOS is simpler to interface to FPGAs at lower rates. |
| Package | 80-pin HTQFP (PFP) | 48-pin HTQFP (PHP) | Different package footprints and pin counts mean the two parts are not drop-in compatible on the same PCB layout. |
| Power Consumption | Approximately 2.2 W | Approximately 0.9 W | Power dissipation affects thermal design and supply sizing; the higher-speed ADS5463 consumes substantially more power. |
| Operating Temperature Range | -40 °C to +85 °C | -40 °C to +85 °C | Identical industrial temperature ratings allow both parts to serve the same environmental conditions. |
Need help validating a replacement?
Send your BOM and application constraints for technical and sourcing review.
Full specification comparison
Use manufacturer datasheets as the final authority.
| Specification | ADS5463IPFP | ADS5413IPHP |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier | - | Rochester Electronics, LLC,Texas Instruments |
| Part Status | Active | Active |
| Number of Bits | 12 | 11 |
| Sampling Rate(Per Second) | 500M | 65M |
| Number of Inputs | 1 | 1 |
| Input Type | Differential | Differential |
| Data Interface | Parallel | Parallel |
| Configuration | S/H-ADC | S/H-ADC |
| Ratio - S / H: ADC | 1:1 | 1:1 |
| Number of A/D Converters | 1 | 1 |
| Architecture | Pipelined | Pipelined |
| Reference Type | Internal | External, Internal |
| Voltage - Supply, Analog | 3V ~ 3.6V, 5V | 3V ~ 3.6V |
| Voltage - Supply, Digital | 3V ~ 3.6V | 3V ~ 3.6V |
| Operating Temperature | -40°C ~ 85°C | -40°C ~ 85°C |
Frequently asked questions
What are the key differences between the ADS5463IPFP and ADS5413IPHP?
The ADS5463IPFP is a 12-bit, 500-MSPS analog-to-digital converter in a 100-pin HTQFP package, while the ADS5413IPHP is a 12-bit, 65-MSPS ADC in a 48-pin HTQFP package. The ADS5463 targets high-speed applications with a parallel CMOS/LVDS output interface, whereas the ADS5413 is a lower-speed device with a parallel CMOS output interface.
Are the ADS5463IPFP and ADS5413IPHP pin-compatible?
No. The ADS5463IPFP uses a 100-pin HTQFP (PFP) package and the ADS5413IPHP uses a 48-pin HTQFP (PHP) package. The different pin counts and land patterns prevent direct PCB footprint compatibility.
What are the maximum sampling rates of these two ADCs?
The ADS5463IPFP supports a maximum sampling rate of 500 MSPS, while the ADS5413IPHP supports a maximum sampling rate of 65 MSPS. The ADS5463 is intended for high-speed digitization, whereas the ADS5413 suits lower-speed signal chains.
Do both devices offer the same resolution and output interface?
Both are 12-bit ADCs. However, the ADS5463IPFP provides parallel CMOS and LVDS output options, while the ADS5413IPHP provides a parallel CMOS output interface. The interface differences affect FPGA/ASIC I/O planning and board layout.
Can the ADS5413IPHP be used as a drop-in replacement for the ADS5463IPFP?
No. Beyond the package and pin-count mismatch, the sampling rate, output interface, and likely analog input drive requirements differ. A replacement requires full validation against the respective datasheets and the target design's timing and signal-chain requirements.
What are the typical applications for each device?
The ADS5463IPFP is suited to high-speed data acquisition, test and measurement, and wideband communications receivers requiring up to 500 MSPS. The ADS5413IPHP is suited to lower-speed instrumentation, imaging, and general-purpose signal digitization at up to 65 MSPS.
Do both parts operate from the same supply voltage?
Both devices are specified for a 3.3 V analog supply and a 3.3 V digital supply per their respective datasheets. Designers should confirm exact supply tolerances and decoupling requirements from the official manufacturer datasheets before layout.