AFE58JD28ZAV
Texas Instruments
- Lifecycle
- Active
- Stock
- 7063 PCS
- Package
- NFBGA-289
- Series
- Data Acquisition - Analog Front End (AFE)
This in-depth comparison of the AFE58JD28ZAV and AFE5803ZCF provides valuable insights into their specifications and key features. We cover important factors in detail, including RoHS compliance, REACH status, series, mounting style, package type, and other relevant characteristics. Presenting the differences side by side simplifies component selection, making it easier for you to select the best option for your specific application.
Replacement verdict
The AFE58JD28ZAV and AFE5803ZCF are not drop-in replacements for one another. The AFE58JD28ZAV is an 8-channel ultrasound analog front end with integrated JESD204B serial output, digital demodulation, and CW Doppler processing, while the AFE5803ZCF is a 16-channel device with LVDS parallel output and a different package and channel architecture. Designers must validate channel count, digital interface, package footprint, and signal-chain configuration before considering any substitution.
Texas Instruments
Texas Instruments
Rows are prioritized by design impact. Highlighted values require attention during substitution.
Key electrical and mechanical differences between the two devices
| Parameter | AFE58JD28ZAV | AFE5803ZCF | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Channels | 16 | 8 | Channel count determines how many transducer elements can be processed simultaneously; a direct functional substitutability constraint. |
| ADC Resolution | 14 bit | 12 bit | Higher resolution improves dynamic range and image quality in ultrasound receive chains. |
| Maximum Sampling Rate | 65 MSPS | 65 MSPS | Sampling rate sets the maximum signal bandwidth the AFE can digitize for a given application. |
| LNA Gain Range | 0 to 24 dB | 0 to 24 dB | Low-noise amplifier gain range affects sensitivity and the ability to match different transducer signal levels. |
| Package | NFBGA (ZAV) | NFBGA (ZCF) | Package footprint and pinout must match for board-level drop-in compatibility. |
| Supply Voltage | 1.8 V / 3.3 V | 1.8 V / 3.3 V | Supply rails must be compatible with the existing power architecture of the system. |
| Interface | LVDS | LVDS | Output interface compatibility determines whether the downstream FPGA or receiver can accept the data stream. |
| Operating Temperature Range | -40 to 85 °C | -40 to 85 °C | Temperature range must cover the target application environment for reliable operation. |
Send your BOM and application constraints for technical and sourcing review.
Use manufacturer datasheets as the final authority.
| Specification | AFE58JD28ZAV | AFE5803ZCF |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier | - | Rochester Electronics, LLC,Texas Instruments |
| Part Status | Active | Active |
| Number of Bits | 12, 14 | 14 |
| Number of Channels | 16 | 8 |
| Power (Watts) | 64 mW | 190 mW |
| Voltage - Supply, Analog | 3.15V ~ 3.6V | 1.7V ~ 1.9V, 3.15V ~ 3.6V, 5V |
| Voltage - Supply, Digital | - | 1.7V ~ 1.9V |
| Mounting Type | Surface Mount | Surface Mount |
The AFE58JD28ZAV is a 16-channel, 14-bit, 65-MSPS analog front-end (AFE) with JESD204B serial output from Texas Instruments, intended for ultrasound and medical imaging systems. The AFE5803ZCF is an 8-channel, 14-bit, 65-MSPS AFE with LVDS serial output, also from Texas Instruments, targeting similar ultrasound signal-chain applications.
The AFE58JD28ZAV integrates 16 receive channels, while the AFE5803ZCF integrates 8 receive channels. This difference directly affects channel density per device and the number of devices required in a multi-channel ultrasound system.
The AFE58JD28ZAV provides a JESD204B serial output interface, whereas the AFE5803ZCF provides an LVDS serial output interface. The JESD204B interface reduces the number of high-speed serial lanes required compared with LVDS, which can simplify board routing in high-channel-count designs.
No. The AFE58JD28ZAV is supplied in a ZAV package, and the AFE5803ZCF is supplied in a ZCF package. The two devices differ in channel count, output interface, and package, so they are not direct drop-in replacements and require separate PCB footprints and layout validation.
Yes. Both the AFE58JD28ZAV and AFE5803ZCF are specified as 14-bit analog front-ends with a maximum sampling rate of 65 MSPS, so their per-channel conversion resolution and sample-rate capability are comparable, while channel count and digital output interface differ.
The AFE58JD28ZAV is generally better suited to high-channel-density designs because it integrates 16 channels per device and uses JESD204B serial output, which reduces the number of serial lanes and interconnect complexity compared with the 8-channel, LVDS-output AFE5803ZCF. Final selection should be validated against the system's channel budget, FPGA serial interface capability, and power/thermal constraints.
No, not as a direct substitute. The AFE5803ZCF has half the channel count (8 versus 16), uses an LVDS output interface instead of JESD204B, and is housed in a different package (ZCF versus ZAV). Any substitution would require redesign of the analog front-end channel count, digital interface, and PCB layout, and must be validated against the manufacturer datasheets.