5CEFA7F23I7N vs 5CEFA2U19A7N

This in-depth comparison of the 5CEFA7F23I7N and 5CEFA2U19A7N provides valuable insights into their specifications and key features. We cover important factors in detail, including RoHS compliance, REACH status, series, mounting style, package type, and other relevant characteristics. Presenting the differences side by side simplifies component selection, making it easier for you to select the best option for your specific application.

Technical review by ETEI Component Engineering Source: manufacturer documentation

Replacement verdict

Not a drop-in replacement

The 5CEFA7F23I7N and 5CEFA2U19A7N are not drop-in replacements for each other. They differ in logic density, package footprint, I/O count, and operating temperature grade, so a direct substitution is not feasible without a full board and timing redesign.

Different logic density Different package footprint Different I/O count Different temperature grade

Parts at a glance

Part A

5CEFA7F23I7N

Intel

Lifecycle
Active
Stock
7313 PCS
Package
FBGA-484
Series
Embedded - FPGAs (Field Programmable Gate Array)
Part B

5CEFA2U19A7N

Intel

Lifecycle
Active
Stock
2002 PCS
Package
FBGA-484
Series
Embedded - FPGAs (Field Programmable Gate Array)

Key differences

Rows are prioritized by design impact. Highlighted values require attention during substitution.

Key electrical and mechanical differences between the two devices

Parameter 5CEFA7F23I7N 5CEFA2U19A7N Why it matters
Family / Series Cyclone V E Cyclone V E Same device family ensures toolchain, IP, and pinout compatibility for migration.
Logic Elements (LE) 149,500 25,000 Logic capacity determines the complexity of designs the FPGA can implement.
Total RAM Bits 7,880,448 1,843,200 Embedded memory affects buffering, data storage, and DSP capability.
Number of I/Os 480 224 I/O count limits peripheral interfaces and external device connectivity.
Package / Case FBGA-484 UBGA-484 Package type affects PCB footprint, assembly, and thermal characteristics.
Operating Temperature -40°C to 100°C (TJ) -40°C to 125°C (TJ) Temperature range determines suitability for industrial or harsh environments.
Supply Voltage 1.07V to 1.13V 1.07V to 1.13V Core voltage must match power design for correct operation and reliability.
Speed Grade 7 7 Speed grade impacts maximum operating frequency and timing closure.
Transceiver Count 9 3 Transceivers enable high-speed serial protocols like PCIe and Ethernet.

Need help validating a replacement?

Send your BOM and application constraints for technical and sourcing review.

Full specification comparison

Use manufacturer datasheets as the final authority.

Specification 5CEFA7F23I7N 5CEFA2U19A7N
Supplier - Intel
Series Cyclone® V E Cyclone® V E
Part Status Active Active
Number of LABs/CLBs 56480 9434
Number of Logic Elements/Cells 149500 25000
Total RAM Bits 7880704 2002944
Number of I/O 240 224
Voltage - Supply 1.07V ~ 1.13V 1.07V ~ 1.13V
Mounting Type Surface Mount Surface Mount
Operating Temperature -40°C ~ 100°C (TJ) -40°C ~ 125°C (TJ)

Frequently asked questions

What are the key differences between the 5CEFA7F23I7N and the 5CEFA2U19A7N?

The 5CEFA7F23I7N and 5CEFA2U19A7N are both Intel (formerly Altera) Cyclone V FPGAs, but they differ in logic density, package, and I/O count. The 5CEFA7F23I7N offers a larger logic array (approximately 150K logic elements) in a 484-pin FBGA package, while the 5CEFA2U19A7N provides a smaller logic array (approximately 25K logic elements) in a 484-pin UBGA package. These differences affect resource availability, power consumption, and PCB layout requirements.

Are the 5CEFA7F23I7N and 5CEFA2U19A7N pin-compatible?

No. The 5CEFA7F23I7N uses a 484-pin FBGA package (F23), while the 5CEFA2U19A7N uses a 484-pin UBGA package (U19). Although both have 484 pins, the package types, ball maps, and thermal characteristics differ, so they are not pin-compatible or drop-in replacements.

Can the 5CEFA2U19A7N be used as a direct substitute for the 5CEFA7F23I7N?

No. The two devices have different logic densities, package types, and I/O capabilities. A direct substitution would require a complete redesign of the PCB, power delivery, and configuration circuitry. Always verify resource requirements and pin assignments against the respective datasheets before considering any replacement.

What are the operating temperature ranges for these two FPGAs?

Both the 5CEFA7F23I7N and 5CEFA2U19A7N are specified for industrial temperature range (I7 suffix), which typically covers -40°C to +100°C junction temperature. For exact thermal specifications, refer to the Intel Cyclone V device datasheet and the respective product ordering information.

Which device is better suited for low-power applications?

The 5CEFA2U19A7N is generally better suited for low-power applications due to its smaller logic density and UBGA package, which typically offers lower static and dynamic power consumption compared to the larger 5CEFA7F23I7N. However, actual power consumption depends on the specific design, clock frequencies, and I/O usage. Use Intel's Early Power Estimator (EPE) tool for accurate comparison.

Do both devices support the same configuration methods?

Yes. Both the 5CEFA7F23I7N and 5CEFA2U19A7N are Cyclone V FPGAs and support the same configuration schemes, including active serial (AS), passive serial (PS), fast passive parallel (FPP), and JTAG configuration. The configuration file size differs due to different logic densities, so the configuration memory requirements will vary.

What are the typical applications for each device?

The 5CEFA7F23I7N, with its higher logic density, is typically used in more complex applications such as industrial motor control, image processing, and communication infrastructure. The 5CEFA2U19A7N, with lower density and smaller package, is often used in cost-sensitive and space-constrained applications like portable devices, simple control interfaces, and sensor fusion.